Quellen:

(1)  Nowicka A, Wilk G, Lipski M, Kołecki J, Buczkowska-Radlińska J, Tomographic Evaluation of Reparative Dentin Formation after Direct Pulp Capping with Ca(OH)2 MTA, Biodentine, and Dentin Bonding System in Human Teeth Journal of Endodontics, 2015

(2) Gong V, França R, Nanoscale chemical surface characterization of four different types of dental pulp-capping materials Journal of Dentistry, 2017 

(3)  Costa F, Sousa Gomes P, Fernandes MH, Osteogenic and Angiogenic Response to Calcium Silicate-based Endodontic Sealers Journal of Endodontics, 2016 

(4) Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, Yadav H, Ragini, Marginal Adaptation Evaluation of Biodentine and MTA Plus in “Open Sandwich” Class II Restorations Journal of Esthetic Restorative Dentistry, 2015 

(5) Özyürek T, Demiryürek EÖ, Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of direct pulp-capping materials: Mineral trioxide aggregate-Angelus and Biodentine Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 2016 

(6)  Bhavana et al., Evaluation of antibacterial and antifungal activity of new calcium-based cement (Biodentine™) compared to MTA and glass ionomer cement Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 2015 

(7)  Thomas Giraud, Imad, About Pulp capping material modulate the balance between inflammation and regeneration Dental Materials, 2019

(8) Internes Dokument Seite 4.

(9) Internes Dokument Interne Daten Seite 4 und Seite 25.

(10) Internes Dokument Seite 3.

(11) A. Zavattini, A. Knight, F. Foschi et al. Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Med., 2020 Mar 13;9(3):782. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030782.

(12) S. Drukteinis, J. Camilleri (Eds.). (2021)., Bioceramic materials in clinical endodontics, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

(13) Internal document. C. Wang, N. Mosahebi, J. Camilleri (2021). Testing of a new premixed BioRoot™ RCS (Septodont)

(14) Internal R&D document page 7. Pr. Imad About.

(15) S. Castro- Jara, B. Antilef, C. Osbén. Bioactivity analysis of calcium silicate-based sealers and_repair cements on the phenotype and cytokine secretion pro_ le of CD14+ monocytes: An ex vivo study. International endodontic Journal.2023;56:80-91.

(9) Ng, Y.-L., Mann, V., Rahbaran, S., Lewsey, J., & Gulabivala, K. (2007). Outcome of primary root_canal treatment: Systematic review of the literature – Part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success._International Endodontic Journal, 40, 921–939.

(10) Ng, Y.-L., Mann, V., & Gulabivala, K. (2008). Outcome of secondary root canal treatment: A_systematic review of the literature._International Endodontic Journal, 41(12), 1026–1046.

* vs. Biodentine

** 24 Monate nach der Behandlung betrug die Erfolgsrate nach weichen Kriterien 91,0 % in der BrF-Gruppe und 90,4 % in der BrRCS-Gruppe (p = 0,0003). Die Ergebnisse der klinischen Studie (Clinicaltrial.gov/NCT04757753) werden derzeit von Experten geprüft.